Knesaren skrev:1080i er IKKE et HD-format som kommer til å overleve.
Det blir 720p og 1080p som kommer til å bli brukt.
jarandmi skrev:Kan noen ofrtelle meg forskjellen på 1080i og 1080p?
jarandmi skrev:Hvorfor anbefales ikke 1080i å brukes? hva anbefales å brukes?
Philip Laven fra European Broadcast Union skrev:All compression schemes deliver better results at lower bitrates with progressive sources.
[...]
It is important to recognise that it is easy to convert a progressive format (e.g. 1080p/50) into an interlaced format (such as 1080i/25), but it is much more difficult to convert an interlaced format into a progressive format.
[...]
At an IBC 2004 session, I was asked to explain why format wars seemed to be on the horizon for Europe. Having explained the EBU’s position in favour of progressive formats, one member of the audience said:
“I am amazed that anybody would consider launching new services based on interlace. I have spent all of my life working on conversion from interlace to progressive. Now that I have sold my successful company, I can tell you the truth: interlace to progressive does not work!”.
This remark was followed by a spontaneous round of applause from the audience. When the person was asked to give his name, he replied “Yves Faroudja” (who is widely acknowledged as the world’s foremost expert on format converters).
Alan Smithee skrev:... personlig skyr jeg det som pesten ...
Registrerte brukere: Google [Bot]